<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Far Edge of Promise &#187; Branding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonmcneal.com/category/branding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonmcneal.com</link>
	<description>Know Donors. Know Success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:25:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Engaging Donors Through Their Senses</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonmcneal.com/2010/07/engaging-donors-through-their-senses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jasonmcneal.com/2010/07/engaging-donors-through-their-senses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason McNeal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonmcneal.com/?p=1616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the reality:  every day marketers fill mailboxes with more direct mail packages, call more homes with pitches, place more advertisements on radio and tv (remember when cable tv meant that there was no advertising?), and fill more magazine pages with ads. And consumers are overwhelmed and not paying much attention anymore.  According to David [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the reality:  every day marketers fill mailboxes with more direct mail packages, call more homes with pitches, place more advertisements on radio and tv (remember when cable tv meant that there was no advertising?), and fill more magazine pages with ads.</p>
<p>And consumers are overwhelmed and not paying much attention anymore.  According to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Data-Smog-Surviving-Information-Glut/dp/0060187018">David Shenk</a>, in 1965, consumers reported recalling 34% of television ads.  By 1990, that number dropped to 8%.</p>
<p>Between the messaging deluge and the fact that we are remembering less of what marketers are delivering to us, I remain unconvinced that a strategy of repeatedly delivering fundraising appeals through traditional &#8220;channels&#8221; (face-to-face, phone, direct mail, magazines, even electronically) will bring the levels of gift income your organization needs or deserves.</p>
<p>What if, instead of focusing so much on the channels, we investigated how our donors <em>experience</em> our institutional brand?  What specific experiences do our donors have when they interact with our institution?  And, then, how do we repeatedly engage the senses of our donors and remind them why supporting our institution is important?</p>
<p>In his book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Brand-Sense-Sensory-Secrets-Behind/dp/B00371V9LI/ref=si_aps_sup_digr?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1280184394&amp;sr=1-1">Brand Sense</a>, Martin Lindstrom suggests that we should craft a &#8220;Five Dimensional Brand.&#8221;  We should communicate our institutional brand through the five senses:</p>
<ul>
<li>Sight &#8211; the most seductive and powerful of all the  senses &#8211; colors impact our emotions and images reinforce beliefs;</li>
<li>Sound &#8211; has the ability to generate mood &#8211; just remember how you feel when you hear a favorite song from your college days;</li>
<li>Smell &#8211; research shows that a full 75% of our emotions are generated by smell;</li>
<li>Touch &#8211; has the power to increase well-being which is why we want to &#8220;stay in touch,&#8221; or feel &#8220;touched&#8221; when something good happens;</li>
<li>Taste &#8211; the weakest of our five senses, but the power of eating an agreeable meal with friends is well understood.</li>
</ul>
<p>So, how can we use the five senses in our work as advancement professionals?  Here are questions that immediately come to mind:</p>
<ul>
<li>Does your direct mail packaging always deliver a distinctive touch and sight?  For instance, what paper stock do you use for the envelope &#8211; standard #10 or distinctive to your organization?</li>
<li>What about the smells and tastes you deliver during events?  Have you thought about establishing a branded smell at your events?  I know some admissions offices at colleges that spray the scent of freshly-baked brownies so that prospective new students will be reminded of a &#8220;warm, home smell.&#8221;</li>
<li>And what about sound?  What distinctive song or tune could you incorporate on your web-page, at events, or through e-solicitations which would remind donors of why your institution is worthy of support?</li>
</ul>
<p>Yes, we should strategize around the channels we use to communicate with donors and prospective donors.  But by itself, that is not enough.  When we communicate through all five senses we give our institution the opportunity to create deeply-personal relationships with donors &#8211; relationships that encourage donors to remember us fondly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jasonmcneal.com/2010/07/engaging-donors-through-their-senses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creating Your Philanthropic Brand Identity</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonmcneal.com/2009/12/creating-your-philanthropic-brand-identity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jasonmcneal.com/2009/12/creating-your-philanthropic-brand-identity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason McNeal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philanthropic Brand Identity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonmcneal.com/?p=686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brand identity, or how you would like others to view your brand, is a key component of creating a successful enterprise.  For those of us in the educational, healthcare, and non-profit sectors, we should regularly be asking ourselves, &#8220;How do we want constituents to describe our organization?&#8221; However, when we ask such a broad question, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brand identity, or how you would like others to view your brand, is a key component of creating a successful enterprise.  For those of us in the educational, healthcare, and non-profit sectors, we should regularly be asking ourselves, &#8220;How do we want constituents to describe our organization?&#8221;</p>
<p>However, when we ask such a broad question, we typically focus the answers on the organization as a whole.  And this organization-wide focus typically means that we aim to strengthening the brand identity of the organization vis-a-vis the core component of the enterprise.   Building brand identity based on the student experience (in education), the patient experience (in healthcare), or the value of the service provided (in other non-profits) is usually the focus.</p>
<p>I suggest, though, that the development office needs to establish a brand identity with donors as well.  And this identity will be built a bit differently than the organization&#8217;s brand because it will focus on other experiences.  To build a strong brand identity with donors &#8211; a philanthropic brand identity &#8211; I suggest answering questions such as:</p>
<ul>
<li>Can your donors expect a thank you note prior to their check clearing their bank?</li>
<li>Do you report back to endowment donors regarding not only the performance of their funds but of the organization&#8217;s endowment overall?</li>
<li>Are your events &#8211; regardless of type &#8211; regularly described as &#8220;meaningful&#8221; or &#8220;emotional&#8221; or &#8220;exceptional&#8221; by donors and prospects?</li>
<li>Do you provide specific and regular feedback to donors which shows how their giving made a difference?</li>
<li>Do you ask volunteers for your organization to recruit other volunteers?</li>
</ul>
<p>There is little question that prospects are attracted to your organization based on its mission of service and based on the organization&#8217;s brand identity.  But once prospects become donors, the development office should establish and strengthen its own brand identity &#8211; its philanthropic brand identity.  If trust is to be created between donors and your organization, this component of brand identity is key.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jasonmcneal.com/2009/12/creating-your-philanthropic-brand-identity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Distinction vs. Distinctiveness</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonmcneal.com/2009/11/distinction-vs-distinctiveness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jasonmcneal.com/2009/11/distinction-vs-distinctiveness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason McNeal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinction vs. distinctiveness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonmcneal.com/?p=635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most organizations claim to have either distinctions or distinctiveness (or both).  Most have neither. A distinction is some aspect of the organization &#8211; typically a program or service &#8211; which has received special recognition.  The recognition usually highlights quality and is proffered by an unbiased third party.  Winning a national award for excellence for your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most organizations claim to have either distinctions or distinctiveness (or both).  Most have neither.</p>
<p>A distinction is some aspect of the organization &#8211; typically a program or service &#8211; which has received special recognition.  The recognition usually highlights quality and is proffered by an unbiased third party.  Winning a national award for excellence for your first year university curriculum would be an example.</p>
<p>A distinctive, on the other hand, is some aspect of the organization &#8211; typically a program or service &#8211; which is highlighted by the organization as being different from (and better than) its competitors.  A specialized, after-visit patient care program at a hospital would be an example.</p>
<p>More often than not, organizations talk about distinction when the evidence is soft at best.  For instance, higher education institutions regularly highlight their &#8220;programs of distinction&#8221; with little to back up the claim (save their own beliefs).</p>
<p>Instead, most organizations should focus on creating distinctiveness.  Distinctiveness draws a sharp, discerning line in the mind of your constituents between you and your competition.  Distinctiveness calls on members of your organization to summon their entrepreneurial and creative spirit which benefits both organization and constituent.  Distinctiveness, usually, can be achieved easier than distinction.</p>
<p>The trick with creating distinctiveness is to identify aspects of your enterprise which enhance constituent satisfaction.  If you create a distinctive new basket-weaving program which utilizes start of the art computer technology at your two-year college, but no students wish to enroll, it doesn&#8217;t much matter that you have this distinctive program.</p>
<p>Your organization can be distinctive if there is capable leadership and execution.  Your organization can have distinction if someone else says so.  Both are wonderful characteristics &#8211; but if I had to, I&#8217;d choose distinctiveness every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jasonmcneal.com/2009/11/distinction-vs-distinctiveness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
